Defense of New Jersey
DWI and Criminal Cases

DWI/ DUI

In this section, you will see examples of some of our winning DWI- DUI cases throughout New Jersey. Hiring the right DWI & criminal defense lawyer can make all the difference. Here are some true examples of real results achieved by Attorney Baffuto for real people.

The examples shown are a portion of Attorney Baffuto’s total winning cases. Call to learn more. *Note that there is no guarantee of a successful outcome in any particular case. Each case is different. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case 1: BrAC = 0.23 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client had driven past a nightclub where police were present for crowd control at closing time. His car crossed out of his lane when he was momentarily distracted looking at women. The police followed his vehicle and he was arrested for a DWI. Alleged BrAC was 0.23%. Many people told him negative things such as “it is impossible to beat a DUI with such high readings”, “No one can beat a DUI in New Jersey”, etc., but the Client did online research for the top lawyer in the state.
After consulting multiple attorneys, this client decided to hire Mr. Baffuto because of his passion, knowledge, personality and decency.
After many court appearances, the client was found “Not Guilty of DWI”*. The client is grateful to Attorney Baffuto and consults with him on all legal matters.

Case 2: BrAC = 0.18 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client was visiting the Jersey Shore and he was arrested for DUI. He wanted to fight to the fullest against his DUI charge. After thorough investigation, he decided to retain Mr. Baffuto to defend his DUI charge. Alleged BrAC was 0.18%. After a long fight in court, the client was found “Not Guilty of DUI”*.

Case 3: CDL License, BrAC = 0.17 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client was charged with DUI in New Jersey. He had recently obtained a CDL license to start his career as a truck driver. Having a DUI conviction could devastate his career prospects and hiring a top-level DUI defense lawyer was critical. Alleged BrAC was 0.17%. He retained Mr. Baffuto to fight the DUI charge to the fullest. After numerous court appearances, this client was found “Not Guilty of DUI”*.

Case 4: BrAC = 0.15 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client was arrested for DWI in New Jersey. He needed to fight his DWI charge because he owns a construction company with a fleet of vehicles. A DWI conviction on his record would have increased insurance premiums and dragged down company profitability.
The client did thorough research and also asked many people in his network to find the best attorney to defend his DWI charge.
After thorough investigation, he decided to retain Mr. Baffuto to defend his DWI charge. Alleged BrAC was 0.15%. After a long fight in court, the client was found “Not Guilty of DWI”*.

Case 5: Client = NJ Licensed Attorney, “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client is a licensed attorney in New Jersey and was charged with Refusal and DWI. The attorney wanted to retain the best DWI attorney to minimize the chance of a DWI conviction. Having heard of the great reputation of Mr. Baffuto and seeing in person how he performs in court confirmed the decision to retain Mr. Baffuto.
After numerous court appearances, this client was found “Not Guilty of a DWI”* and “Not Guilty of Refusing Breath Testing”*.

Note that clients from Cases 6 & 7 are a married couple. You can see how an entire household have high confidence in Mr. Baffuto. Both spouses retained Mr. Baffuto and both were “Not Guilty of a DUI”*.

Case 6: BrAC = 0.18 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client works as a sales manager. He was arrested for a DWI in New Jersey. This was his second arrest.
It was important to fight this DUI charge to the fullest. Having under-aged young drivers under his family auto policy, a DUI conviction on his record would have drastically increased insurance premiums. This client’s spouse had previously retained Mr. Baffuto. After a long fight, the spouse was found “Not Guilty of a DUI”*.
The client was very impressed with the verdict in the spouse’s case and he could not think of retaining any other attorney besides Mr. Baffuto. Decisively, he chose to retain Mr. Baffuto to defend his DWI charge as well. Alleged BrAC was 0.18%. State’s evidence was strong; it was a difficult case to defend. After more than 3 days of hearings, the client was “Not Guilty of DWI”*.

Case 7: Client = the spouse of Case 6; BrAC= 0.09 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client was arrested for a DUI in New Jersey. This was her first DUI arrest. She knew how important it was to find the best lawyer who would stand up for the client when she was in trouble. So she did thorough online research and educated herself about choice of lawyers and found out that there were not many attorneys who were willing to fight for their clients.

Upon reading Attorney Baffuto’s website and learning of so many successful cases the then-prospective client was confirmed in the decision to retain Mr. Baffuto. After many court appearances, this client was found “Not Guilty of a DWI”*.

Case 8: Client = NJ Licensed Attorney , “Not Guilty of a DWI”*

  The client is a licensed attorney in New Jersey and was charged with Refusal and DWI. This was not the first arrest and the attorney faced severe consequences. The attorney takes DWI cases and is fully aware of reputations of lawyers in the state. The attorney had to retain the best DWI attorney in the state to avoid a DWI conviction. Of over 60,000+ attorneys in the state, and knowing that Mr. Baffuto “is the top DUI lawyer in the state”, and is the “Lawyers’ Lawyer”, and that his reputation is to stand up for his client to the end, he retained Mr. Baffuto. After numerous court appearances, this client was found “Not Guilty of a DWI”*.

Case 9: BrAC = 0.15 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client was arrested for DWI in New Jersey. She worked as a manager in a big corporation. As she needed to drive everyday, the client did thorough online research and also asked many people in her network to find the best attorney to defend her DWI charge. After thorough investigation, she decided to retain Mr. Baffuto to defend her DWI charge. Alleged BrAC was 0.15%.
After many court appearances, the client was found “Not Guilty of DWI”*.

Case 10: BrAC = 0.13 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client was working in show business. After the client socialized with friends at a restaurant, the client was arrested for DUI in New Jersey.
One of the client’s family members did thorough research and found Mr. Baffuto’s website. Both the family and the client read the website and were very impressed about Mr. Baffuto’s results. After thorough investigation and consideration, the client decided to retain Mr. Baffuto to defend a DWI charge. Alleged BrAC was 0.13%. Attorney Baffuto stuck with the case and the client was found “Not Guilty of DWI”*.

Case 11: Client = “Not Guilty of DWI”*& “Not Guilty of Refusal”*

  The client is a NY resident and was driving in Northern New Jersey. While driving at night, he forgot to turn on the head lights. He was pulled over and taken to the local police station for breath testing.
The client was charged with both DUI and Refusal.
After researching online and reading of Mr. Baffuto’s reputation and performance, he saw that Mr. Baffuto’s passion is to stand up for his clients. So he decided to retain Mr. Baffuto. Attorney Baffuto devised a strategy turning on a critical legal technicality, and this client was found “Not Guilty of a DWI”* and “Not Guilty of Refusing Breath Testing”*.

Case 12: BrAC = 0.10 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client was a full-time college student. He was socializing with his friends in Western New Jersey. On the way home, he was stopped by the State Police for a motor vehicle violation. He was arrested for DWI and taken to a New Jersey State Police Barrack for breath testing. Alleged BrAC was 0.10%. Using his technical background, he did very through online research regarding the consequences of DWI conviction and the best lawyer to defend his case. During his online research, he found Mr. Baffuto’s website. The client initially was skeptical about winning a DWI charge in New Jersey, but he found that Mr. Baffuto’s “winning cases” were quite impressive. After extensive court litigation, the client was found “Not Guilty of DWI”*.

Case 13: BrAC = 0.08 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client attended a friend’s wedding and on the way home, she was stopped for a motor vehicle violation. The client was charged with DUI and taken to the local police department for breath testing. Alleged BrAC was 0.08%. After researching online and reading Mr. Baffuto’s good reviews, she telephoned Mr. Baffuto’s office to have a consultation. After a telephone consultation, she was certain that Mr. Baffuto would not plead her guilty and she decided to retain Mr. Baffuto. After thorough preparation and several court appearances, this client was found “Not Guilty of a DWI”*.

Case 14: BrAC = 0.09 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client worked as a pharmaceutical executive in New Jersey. He had hosted clients at a restaurant. On the way home, he was stopped by local police for speeding.
Client was charged with DUI and taken to the local police department for breath testing. Alleged BrAC was 0.09%.
After researching about how to choose the best DUI lawyer to defend his case, he realized that Attorney Baffuto was one of the defense counsel that litigated the landmark DUI case, State v. Chun, et al.
The client wanted to fight to the fullest for his rights. After consultation, he decided to retain Attorney Baffuto.
After a thorough and strategic defense, this client was found “Not Guilty of a DWI”*.

Case 15: BrAC = 0.15 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client was pursuing graduate study at a prestigious school. When he was driving at night, he had a one-car accident. No one was injured. Police came and investigated the scene.
The client was arrested for DUI and taken to headquarters for breath testing. Alleged BrAC was 0.15%. Using his research skills, the client did thorough online research. He wanted to fight to the fullest in defense of his rights. He retained Attorney Baffuto after one telephone consultation. Attorney Baffuto stood up for this client and did not plead the client out. The client was found “Not Guilty of DWI”*.

Case 16: “Not Guilty of DWI”* & “Not Guilty of Refusal”*

  The client was a college student from abroad.
When she was driving at night, she was pulled over and arrested by local police for breath testing. The client was charged with both DUI and Refusal.
After researching online and finding out more about Attorney Baffuto’s reputation and various successes, she decided to hire Mr. Baffuto. She was also assured that Attorney Baffuto was aware of immigration issues in defending international clients.
Attorney Baffuto challenged the State’s evidence and conduct of its investigation. This client was found “Not Guilty of a DWI”* and “Not Guilty of Refusing Breath Testing”*.

Case 17: BrAC = 0.13 “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client was a college student.
Police came and investigated as this client returned to his car.
The client was arrested for DUI and taken to headquarters for breath testing. Alleged BrAC was 0.13%. Using his personal network, the client had searched for a DUI lawyer. He retained Attorney Baffuto after in-person consultation.
Attorney Baffuto challenged the State’s evidence and the client was found “Not Guilty of DWI”*.

Case 18: Client = “Not Guilty of DWI”*

  The client was an IT professional.
When he was driving at night, he was pulled over by local police for speeding and taken into custody for breath testing.
The client was charged with both DUI and Refusal.
After researching online and finding out more about Attorney Baffuto’s reputation on his website, he decided to hire Mr. Baffuto. He wanted to hire the best DWI attorney in New Jersey Attorney Baffuto appeared in court several times and the client was found “Not Guilty of DWI”*