Evidence Needed to Demonstrate Guilt in a Drug DUI Case

When charged with driving under the influence of drugs, the consequences can be just as severe as those for alcohol-related DUI offenses, if not more so. Drug DUI cases are complex because of the broad spectrum of substances that can impair a driver’s abilities. At the Law Offices of Bartholomew Baffuto, clients can expect a robust defense that examines every aspect of the evidence presented against them.

The Defendant’s Arrest and Trial

In New Jersey, law enforcement officers are trained to recognize signs of impairment, whether from alcohol or drugs. Once stopped, a driver may undergo a series of field sobriety tests designed to gauge their coordination, balance, and cognitive function.

If an officer suspects drug impairment, they may call upon a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) to conduct a more specialized evaluation. DREs are trained to identify the effects of various drugs on a person’s physical and mental faculties. Their assessment typically includes checking the suspect’s pulse, pupil size, and muscle tone, among other indicators. The results of these tests often play a pivotal role in the prosecution’s case.  There are no statutory penalties for declining to consent to cooperate with an evaluation by a DRE.  However, in the event that the police obtain a search warrant then cooperation with blood or urine sampling would be required if the warrant were to authorize sampling.  There are, however, statutory penalties upon conviction of refusing to cooperate with breath testing.

Once arrested, the defendant will be charged where the prosecution bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was under the influence of drugs at the time of driving.

At trial, the evidence is scrutinized by both the prosecution and defense. The reliability of field sobriety tests, the qualifications of the arresting officers, and the legitimacy of the DRE’s findings are all potential points of contention. Moreover, the defense may challenge the procedures used to collect and handle any blood or urine samples, which are critical in determining the presence of drugs.  Consent to breath testing is legally required.  Obtaining a blood or urine sample from an arrestee requires a search warrant to be signed by a judge.

Bartholomew Baffuto, Esquire, a skilled DUI attorney in Toms River can dissect the arrest process, challenge questionable evidence, and sometimes present alternative explanations for the defendant’s behavior. A strategic approach ensures that the defendant’s rights are protected throughout the trial.

Evidence Needed to Prove Guilt in a Drug DUI Case

One of the primary pieces of evidence used in such cases is the testimony of the arresting officer and that of any Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) having investigated.

The arresting officer’s observations—such as erratic driving, slurred speech, or unusual behavior—can be powerful evidence when compounded by the results of field sobriety tests. The DRE’s evaluation, which purports to thoroughly examine a suspect’s physical and psychological state, is also frequently part of the State’s evidence. The DRE may testify about signs of drug impairment, such as dilated pupils, elevated pulse rates, or muscle tremors, which are often claimed to be linked to specific drug categories.

Another piece of evidence is the toxicology report. After the arrest, the defendant may be subjected to a blood or urine test to detect the presence of drugs. These tests can identify a wide range of substances, from prescription medications to illegal drugs. However, merely detecting drugs in the system is not enough; the prosecution must also prove that the quantity of the drug and the timing of the act of ingestion impaired the defendant’s ability to drive. This is where the defense often focuses its efforts, arguing that the drug levels found were too low to cause impairment or had been excreted before the time of having driven.

The prosecution might also rely on expert testimony to interpret the toxicology results. An expert may explain how specific drugs affect the brain and body, linking the drug’s presence to the observed impairment. However, this testimony is often contested, as the defense may present its experts to refute the claims or highlight the limitations of drug testing methods.

The chain of custody for any physical evidence, such as blood or urine samples, is another area for legal challenges. The defense may argue that the samples were mishandled, contaminated, or otherwise compromised, which could cast doubt to the validity of the toxicology report.  Lack of a search warrant, or scrutiny of the sworn statement of probable cause given to secure a warrant, can be another line of attack.

The skilled DWI defense attorney at the Law Office of Bartholomew Baffuto, Esquire will meticulously examine every aspect of your case, from the moment of your arrest to the presentation of evidence in court. Your attorney can work to identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and protect your rights.

Featured Image Source: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/car-accident-bus-pov-first-person-1195859707